Top Ten Reasons for Banning Books by Ethnic Minorities?

Whenever a community of any sort starts banning books, you know they’re afraid of something, usually themselves.  But perhaps the Arizona illuminati deserve a little sympathy.  After all, there could be reasons for forbidding the teaching of books whose authors do not come from the “preferred” ethnicity.  In the spirit of understanding, we offer the following:

Top Ten Reasons for Not Reading or Teaching Literature by Ethnic Minorities

10. Readers might have to look up some words like corazon or coeur.

9. If you have all that much time on your hands, you could re-read Twilight and its sucklings, which are about things that really matter.

8. Exposure to books by Thomas Sanchez, Carlos Fuentes or Helena Maria Viramontes might break through the protective armor of solipsism.  Then where would you be?

7. You might start to believe the words of the sonnet by Emma Lazarus on the bronze plaque under that big statue in New York Harbor.

6. With all these confusing counter-narratives going at once, how can we construct a cozy American myth?

5. Entertaining movies made from the books and internet summaries might be hard to find.  And then where would you be?

4. Readers with ethnic heritage similar to the authors of the black-listed books might find encouragement and entitlement, which might make them stronger, more active members of the national community.

3. Newt might not get to send minorities to his proposed fifty-first state, the moon.

2.  The forbidden books might explode and blind readers.

1. As John Milton wrote, “That which purifies us is trial, and trial is by what is contrary.”  Doesn’t that just seem like a lot of hard work?


recent-meR. T. Smith has edited Shenandoah since 1995 and serves as Writer-in-Residence at Washington & Lee. His forthcoming books are Doves in Flight: 13 Fictions and Summoning Shades: New Poems, both due in 2017.

 

An Update On Contests

Today (December 9th), we mailed notices of selection to the finalists of the 2011 Graybeal-Gowen Prize! We’ll be posting more specifics on the finalists later; while the USPS delivers whether snow or rain or gloom of night, they are not so speedy as the internet, and it’s only fair the finalists be the first to know. Hopefully, the postman is quick and we can make a more detailed announcement very soon.

 

For those that don’t know, the Graybeal-Gowen Prize is an annual contest hosted by Shenandoah through the generous gift of Mr. James Graybeal W&L ’49 and his wife Mrs. Priscilla Gowen Graybeal. The contest focuses upon Virginian poets and poetry- entrants must either have been born in Virginia or have established Virginia residency. In 2011, Shenandoah was very pleased to have received approximately 300 submissions. While submissions for the 2011 prize have closed, there’s always 2012! If you’re a Virginia poet, think of it as ten months to prepare a great poem for us to consider! For full details on the Graybeal-Gowen Prize, please visit the prize’s page here.

 

The contests don’t stop with the Graybeal-Gowen, either. Shenandoah is also preparing to announce the 2011 winners of our annual prizes in Fiction, Non-Fiction, and Poetry. We have just a little more to do, and hope to have the announcement available soon. These awards are selected from work published in Shenandoah in the last year. More information on these awards can be found on our prizes page.

 

For any reviewers out there, Shenandoah will be inaugurating an annual prize for reviews in 2012. The prize will operate in the same fashion as the previously mentioned ones for Fiction, Non-Fiction, and Poetry, i.e., selected from material published in Shenandoah. The current issue of Shenandoah contains five reviews; to see the sort of piece we’re looking to publish (and therefore considering for the prize), please visit the current issue.

Happy Holidays!


So we are supposed to judge the covers…

I recently stumbled across an interesting article in the New York Times.  I’ve lately been interested in the ongoing print vs. electronic debate in the book world, and this article offered an interesting answer to the question:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/books/publishers-gild-books-with-special-effects-to-compete-with-e-books.html?ref=books

One line in particular stuck out.  “If e-books are about ease and expedience, the publishers reason, then print books need to be about physical beauty and the pleasures of owning, not just reading.”  There are pictures in the article of books with beautiful, embossed covers, gilded pages, tasseled bookmarks.  It’s true that many of these features might make a book a beautiful addition to your shelf or coffee table.  However, for now at least, it doesn’t seem that many people take their decorator to the bookstore and pick up the latest Stephen King because their den needs some more color.  It seems to me that the pleasures of owning are intertwined with the pleasures of reading. 

Working on a paper the other night, I found myself on the floor of the library, going through volume after volume of the beautiful 1903 Library Edition of the Works of Ruskin, and I have to say that the deckled edges and thick, high quality paper made the experience infinitely more enjoyable.  I know the same thing goes for my books at home.  My “pleasures of owning” don’t come from the books’ physical beauty, but more from the way their appearance correlates with my memory of reading them.  I have a beautiful edition of Pride & Prejudice and I admit I liked it  better than my dog-eared paper back.  I like it better not just because it looks nicer on the shelf, but because the sky blue cloth cover covered in burnt red curling script makes me feel a little more Jane Austenian, a little more Lizzie Bennet curled up in a tree, when I read it.  

You’ll note that the picture at the very top of the page shows Jay-Z signing his intricate memoir.  Not having read Decoded I can’t comment on it or how it compares to the rest of the celebrity memoir wave, but it is interesting to see how gorgeous editions are no longer reserved for the classics.  I only hope that publishers are realizing that while we can judge books, and maybe buy them, by their covers, content will never cease to be important.