by Mansie Hough

Spring Break is rapidly approaching at W&L, which means that booklovers are hunting for the perfect, easygoing vacation novel. One of the most classic ways to relax in that precious week off for so many is to slide into a bathing suit, blend a margarita, and head to the beach or the pool with a book in hand. Blogs and publications try to capitalize on this phenomenon every spring season with a new list of the top 10 “beach reads” from that year. But what exactly constitutes a beach read? It’s one of those amorphous subgenres, like slipstream or absurdism, which you can’t exactly define, but you know them when you see them. Most of the world seems to agree that a beach read is a trashy, throwaway novel that you can easily digest in a few poolside sittings, and has little to no intellectual or artistic value. Like a trip to the beach, these books are supposed to be as entertaining and non-taxing for the reader as possible.

But do summer reads have to be easy? Is there such thing as a “literary beach read,” or does the presence of any literary merit automatically disqualify a book from being considered a beach read? Many of Jane Austen’s works were, during her lifetime, considered tacky romance novels meant for rich housewives to read on the couch. And, as we all know, they are now considered literary classics, and are being taught in the majority of higher educational institutions. So what exactly is a beach read? What are its criteria, and is there a perfectly executed, exemplary beach read out there? Of course, much of this is all relative to your perspective on what “easy” means, and what you are looking to get out of your “relaxing” reading experience. There might be someone out there who takes Finnegans Wake or Infinite Jest to a carefree weekend getaway in The Keys, for all I know. Google “smart beach reads,” and you’ll come up with hundreds of lists basically titled “Summer Beach Reads! But DON’T WORRY, they’re highbrow and not embarrassing.” To get a better idea, let’s take a look at what types of books have been classified as beach reads throughout the past.

• 

  Romance, preferably something involving travel or set in an airy seaside town like Cinque Terra. Based on no research, I would probably say this is the most popular type of “beach read,” and where the category cross references with “chick lit.” Popular novels here span across many centuries, and include the aforementioned Jane Austen crew, Wuthering Heights, Gone with the Wind, Jane Eyre, The Time Traveler’s Wife, Delirium, Something Borrowed, and anything by Nicholas Sparks, John Green or Sarah Dessen.

• Mysteries and suspense, another popular tote cohabitant with towels and sunglasses. These mysteries usually feature a female protagonist in her 20s or 30s with a dark or depressing past. Other popular elements include visiting the POV of the killer and a sexy detective love interest. A long list of contenders includes Gone Girl, Donna Tartt’s The Secret History, Stephen King’s Mr. Mercedes, Agatha Christie’s And Then There Were None, Jennifer DuBois’ Cartwheel, Tana French’s In the Woods, and Tom Savage’s A Penny for the Hangman. One could also look into genre celebrities like Dan Brown and James Patterson.
• Stories that warn against upper class frivolity and failure. Nothing like sipping on a daiquiri by the pool and watching drama unfold in the Upper East Side, or listening to the Lost Generation lament the deterioration of the American Dream. Novels here include Anna Karenina, This Side of Paradise, Gossip Girl, Kimberly McCreight’s Reconstructing Amelia, Edith Wharton’s The House of Mirth, and, of course, The Great Gatsby.
• This is, personally, my favorite kind of book to unwind with on vacation: collections of whimsical short stories and memoirs. In her second memoir, Why Not Me?, Mindy Kaling jokes with the reader that he or she found the book in the “Stress-Free Summer Beach Reads” section of the store. Of course, there are certainly short stories and memoirs that don’t fit into the beach read category; a lavish Spring Break vacation probably isn’t the most fitting place to read Elie Wiesel’s Night. But you can gleefully dip in and out of David Sedaris’ Let’s Explore Diabetes with Owls, BJ Novak’s One More Thing, Aimee Bender’s Willful Creatures, Jennifer Egan’s A Visit from the Goon Squad, and celebrity memoirs such as Tina Fey’s Bossy Pants and Stephen Colbert’s satirical I Am America and So Can You! This Spring Break and summer, I’m hoping to delve deeper into works by Nick Hornby, Dave Eggers, and Kelly Link.

This is where my confusion about what constitutes a beach read begins. I know people who would consider Egan’s work literary—Goon Squad did win a Pulitzer, after all—and yet she is included in some recommended summer reading lists I’ve seen. I’m not saying this means it should be taught in college literature classes, but there is something to be said for a collection that you can enjoy for entertainment value in a more relaxed setting, and then sink your teeth into upon a more devoted rereading. I’d like to see, for example, where a Joyce Carol Oates or Raymond Carver might fall on this spectrum, as I think their stories are entertaining both superficially and on a deeper level. The economical quality of writing that short stories and memoirs require allows for this cross section of literary and popular fiction. So, to answer my own question, I say yes, there is such a thing as a “literary beach read.” Now, I say this hesitantly and at the mercy of those who are more well read and educated on literary fiction than I am, and I can see reasons why someone might disagree with me.

What do you think? Whether you think I’m crazy or you agree, I hope you can find the perfect story to dive into (or bask in) this coming Spring Break.

by Hendley Badcock

 

J. Hogan’s 2003 film Peter Pan is my favorite version of the classic fairy tale, although Steven Spielberg’s 1991 film Hook is a close second. Maybe you prefer the original 1953 Disney movie or one of its sequels. Or the 2004 film Finding Neverland or Pan, which came out just last year. Or you could be a traditionalist and just really prefer J. M. Barrie’s Peter and Wendy. Regardless, we certainly are not short of options when it comes to enjoying the story.

Fairy tales like Peter Pan have survived not only through their abstract adventures and supernatural characters, but also through their narrative lessons and social commentary that both children and adults can grasp. Entertainment lies just at the surface of a timeless fairy tale. Tolkien writes that “a ‘fairy-story’ is one that touches on or uses Faërie [a fantasy realm which humans can experience], whatever its own main purpose may be: satire, adventure, morality, fantasy.”[i] Modern writers continue to modify or extend the narrative of fairytales to better analyze or critique their current culture.

Barrie’s Peter and Wendy has replanted itself in the cultures of every generation since its first on-stage production in 1904 and its publication as a novel in 1911. Literary critics speculate why we’ve held on so closely to Peter Pan and its exciting, mysterious, alluring fantasy world of flying across the stars and fighting pirates. Allison B. Kavey and Lester D. Friedman attribute its endurance to its unique genre, “one that is originally written for children, but not primarily read by adults and absorbed by children through other media, such as films.”[ii] They cite Peter Pan as an alter-reality for twenty-first century men and women’s desire to stay young and beautiful and to escape the constant demands and responsibilities crowding our schedules.

The above-mentioned films have all tweaked the story or perspective of Peter Pan in some way, but one of the most interesting renditions I’ve come across since I’ve been in college seems a bit like fan fiction but is writing with a biting, witty tongue. In her 2013 chapbook Darling Hands, Darling Tongue, poet Sally Rosen Kindred argues that women suffer from oppressive binds of traditional Victorian and Edwardian gender stereotypes in Barrie’s Peter and Wendy. She comments on the original work’s sexism by recasting the story’s largely unheard female characters of Tinker Bell, Wendy, and Tiger Lily as the focus of her verse.

In “Tiger Lily Leaves the Book for Now,” Kindred assigns angry and smart speech for the extremely self-aware American Indian princess. Tiger Lily, is the least active or vocal of Barrie’s women. Although Tiger Lily assumes command over her father’s tribe on Neverland, the princess embodies a paradox of power and passivity in both her femininity and ethnicity. She’s portrayed as an erotic, exotic parody to Peter and the Lost Boys. Be mindful that the British Empire was rising to the height of its global spread in the early 1900s.

Disturbed by Barrie’s racist and sexist portrayal of the girl, Kindred’s Tiger Lily lives in the present and embodies modernist ideals more so than any of the other characters in verse:

 

If my mouth were a place
the plot came aground, found
sand, found words rounded like wet stones
and teeth,
if my arms                                                                               5
held bones demanding description
and each bone were a song
or a weapon,
if my fists were full of opals
I’d keep reading.                                                                     10
If my lips moved in this story
we could talk.
I’ve shut your book. Just think
if my sisters and brothers were more
than a smudge on the page, than Redskins                  15
moving in tandem, marching
in some dim
ellipse, waiting to be elected
for salvation
or the Superbowl.                                                                   20
Imagine me, waking: the chapter’s
light defined
by my lids swinging wide.
I want to be specific, arch my left
brow, my story                                                                       25
all linguistics
and technology. I want to be so ugly
you can’t look. I want a family
but you’ve given me a beer in the cheap seats.
Make me a crazed spiral,                                                        30
nautilus scrawling
Newton’s laws in the sand. Or a girl, fine,
and American, I’ll do it still:
all I need’s something to write with,
a quarter or a cigarette.                                                            35
I’ve thrown down your book.
Bend or kneel to find it. Open it
back up, light your fervent candles.
I’m the patron saint of getting out of here.

 

Tiger Lily, who never speaks in Barrie’s original work, here speaks in the first person and addresses the original author directly, assertively telling him that she has “shut” and “thrown down” his book (24-25). She makes a deal with the author—“if [her] mouth were a place the plot came aground,” “if [her] arms held bones demanding description,” “if [her] fists were full of opals,” “if [her] lips moved in this story” (24). Given the same attention and authority as other characters, Tiger Lily would be willing to reconsider her rejecting Barrie and Peter Pan. She indeed shows signs of agency and ambition, as she prefers to construct with her mouth and eyes an alternative plot.

Tiger Lily is also intelligent and crafty, appealing to her male oppressors with language they might understand—the language of professional football. But she also mentions physics as she alludes to “scrawling Newton’s laws in the sand” (25). After all, the third law of motion is all about action and reaction and Kindred is responding to Barrie. Additionally, she knows what she wants—“to be so ugly [he] can’t look,” as well as to have a family (24). The former resists any sexual objectification that was present in the novel. The latter cannot be bought from her with “beer in the cheap seats” (24). It is clear Kindred’s Tiger Lily will not settle for any nonsense and nothing less than she deserves.

Kindred could not see Tiger Lily sustaining Barrie’s time period and thus created an agentic, decisive, and serious young woman who demands equality and respect. But, writing with a new perspective and current society in mind, Kindred successfully extends the story of the trapped and voiceless women of Peter Pan and challenges our repeated acceptance of a one-hundred-year-old plot.

 

[i] Tolkien , J. R. R. . “On Fairy-Stories.” Trans. Array Tree and Leaf. George Allen and Unwin, 1964. Web. 10 Mar. 2014.

 

[ii] Kavey, Allison B., and Lester D. Friedman. Second Star to the Right: Peter Pan in the Popular Imagination . Rutgers University Press, 2008. Print.

 

by Mansie Hough

Whether it takes form in a classic piece of literary fiction, a creatively creepy poem, or a pop-culture beach read, I love a good mystery story. It seems the genre, in all its broadness, will never run out of innovative ways to look at human nature, psychology, and the concept of trust. Mystery, when done well, is tricky and engaging for both the reader and the author. The active reader must think critically, suspiciously, and frequently when reading a good mystery story. If that reader is me, she must also resist the temptation to quickly search the ending on Wikipedia or stay up until 5 am on a school night to find out what happens. More crucially, though, for an author, great difficulty lies in some crucial decisions: which information to withhold, when to schedule big (or small) reveals, how to set a tone that puts people on edge, and suspect characterization. Not surprisingly, a lot of these issues can either be solved or exacerbated by the mystery’s narrator. We all learned about this in school when our English teachers taught us about the unreliable narrator.

Perhaps the greatest and most well-known example of the impact of an unreliable first-person narrator came from the notoriously unnerving Edgar Allan Poe. In classic works like “Annabel Lee,” ““The Cask of Amontillado,” and “The Bells,” the mentally unstable narrators speak in either fast-paced, jumpy styles or a voice that drones on and on about petty surface details of the plot. Additionally, Poe’s narrators rarely, if ever, stop to question the possibility of their own insanity. It’s always the world’s fault rather than their own, and that’s if the narrator can even come around and acknowledge they are in an unusual situation. The narrator in “Annabel Lee” has romanticized his love interest so much that he regresses to a childlike, obsessive state, and this distorts the way the story is told. Similarly, in “The Cask of Amontillado,” Montresor sees no other reasonable reaction to being insulted other than to brutally murder the culprit, which results in an inappropriately casual mention of the incident. And, finally, “The Bells” shows us that depending on the point of view of the story’s narrator, symbols of beauty, hope, and joy can quickly turn into something much more dark and sinister. Poe’s innovative use of perspective in these stories puts the reader into a position of uncertainty and uneasiness from start to finish, and the deeper subplot comes from the narrator’s twisted rendition of the surface plot.

By no means did Poe invent the unreliable narrator—the trend can be identified in certain Ancient Greek works and Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. But by focusing on the narrator’s delusions, Poe popularized a strategy that has been applied to a diverse array of literary works. Ralph Ellison used the tactic in his 1952 novel Invisible Man. In Invisible Man, the plot develops independently as we witness the anonymous main character begin to psychologically break down. Kate Chopin employs the unreliable narrator in her work of short fiction The Awakening—not exactly a mystery, but the strategy works well for her. In the end, we are left as an audience to decide if the main character Edna’s self-destructive actions are a result of an oppressive society or her own selfish mania. Edna is not the same unreliable narrator as one that Poe would dream up or as Ellison’s unnamed protagonist. Montresor is a vicious, narcissistic madman; Edna is a conflicted liar; The Invisible Man is an anxious, paranoid victim. One could even say Huck Finn and Holden Caufield are unreliable narrators as they cannot see past their lack of experience to tell a truly accurate story. It’s hard to draw the line at where unreliability ends and distinct narrative voice starts, because every first-person narrator will tell a story hindered by personal biases to an extent. But that’s why the Poe-esque exaggerated unreliability is so interesting and lends itself well to diversity in voices and tones.

So what has become of the unreliable narrator in pop culture mysteries today? Our old pal is thriving, in the form of a literarily controversial condition: amnesia. S.J. Watson’s wildly popular 2011 novel Before I Go to Sleep features a first-person narrator who suffers from short term memory loss, and must slowly piece together secrets around who she has become in the time that she lost. Similarly, Paula Hawkins’ 2015 novel Girl on the Train uses the main character’s alcoholism to (literally) black out important clues and scenes pertaining to an ongoing investigation. Ruth Ware’s 2015 novel In a Dark, Dark Wood uses violence-induced amnesia to muddy its mystery’s waters as well.

Amnesia and memory loss can be a tough point in mystery thrillers. It is quite difficult to pull this method off without making the story feel contrived, convenient, and implausible. If critics do not deem your use of memory loss successful, be prepared for a barrage of sarcastic jokes about the Adam Sandler film 50 First Dates. But, when done right, this tool paces the story in a unique way that makes the reader feel helpless as he or she struggles along with the frustrated, mentally exhausted narrator. This approach also throws a wrench into the “likely suspects” trope of the genre. When the narrator’s mental facilities and memory are totally intact, it’s easy to rank all tangential characters from “definitely a psychopath” to “not a chance.” However, amnesia yanks this rug from underneath us and forces us to be more in the present moment with the narrator, and this makes us vulnerable. All of these enjoyable results of an unreliable narrator are reasons why I love mystery stories, and I am excited to see what the trend will twist into next.

by Camille Hunt

The sun is shining, the birds are singing, and the flowers are blooming. Each year, the turning of seasons from winter to spring conjures up the old pastel cliché of green grass and warm weather, Easter eggs and daffodils Literature sometimes provides an alternative vision of spring, however; poet William Wordsworth puts a dark spin on the bright season, particularly in his late eighteenth century poem “Lines Written in Early Spring.”

Wordsworth’s “Lines Written in Early Spring” reflects his concerns about the development of industrialization, which took hold during his 19^th century writing career. The Industrial Revolution took place from the 18^th and 19^th centuries, transitioning Europe and America from primarily agrarian to urban societies. Industrialization introduced new technology, mass production, and a focus on factory work. The birthplace of the Industrial Revolution was Great Britain, its extensive deposits of coal and iron ore setting it up as an abundant source of raw materials. Nature took on a completely new meaning; it became a source to be exploited to contribute to a material world. Where Nature previously existed as the allegorical provider of life, industrialization made it a source for man to create a new life for modernized humans. The poet considers “What man has made of man” in his verse of alternate rhyme.

 

I heard a thousand blended notes,
While in a grove I sate reclined,
In that sweet mood when pleasant thoughts
Bring sad thoughts to the mind.

To her fair works did Nature link
The human soul that through me ran;
And much it grieved my heart to think
What man has made of man.

Through primrose tufts, in that green bower,
The periwinkle trailed its wreaths;
And ‘tis my faith that every flower
Enjoys the air it breathes.

The birds around me hopped and played,
Their thoughts I cannot measure:—
But the least motion which they made
It seemed a thrill of pleasure.

The budding twigs spread out their fan,
To catch the breezy air;
And I must think, do all I can,
That there was pleasure there.

If this belief from heaven be sent,
If such be Nature’s holy plan,
Have I not reason to lament
What man has made of man?

The first stanza of the poem has only become increasingly relevant over time. Man is now facing the consequences of the Industrial Revolution, the repercussions of “what man has made of man.” The wild weather this spring has made the season unpredictable, fluctuating between snow and temperatures above 80 degrees Fahrenheit. With each warm, sunny day, we might be “In that sweet mood when pleasant thoughts / Bring sad thoughts to the mind,” at first elated by a cloudless sky before being reminded that an abruptly hot day amidst rising and falling weather patterns could be a result of global warming.

“What man has made of man” goes against what Nature made man to be. Man has made itself a rival of Nature, a creator with no right to change what Nature created, and yet that is what we have done. We do not live harmoniously in Nature’s world, and each unnaturally warm spring day comes with a nagging reminder that the warmth we enjoy now is the result of “What man has made of man.”

Poet Wendell Berry’s 2009 poem “A Speech to the Garden Club of America” echoes Wordsworth’s thoughts in a modern world. Published in the New Yorker, the poem continues Wordsworth’s lamentation of “What man has made of man,” referencing the burning of fossil fuels to sustain the lives of men instead of living by Nature’s laws, asking, “Why not survive / By Nature’s laws that still keep up alive?” and denouncing “our economic pyre / That draws from ancient rock a fossil fire, / An anti-life of radiance and fume.”

 

Thank you. I’m glad to know we’re friends, of course;
There are so many outcomes that are worse.
But I must add I’m sorry for getting here
By a sustained explosion through the air,
Burning the world in fact to rise much higher
Than we should go. The world may end in fire
As prophesied—our world! We speak of it
As “fuel” while we burn it in our fit
Of temporary progress, digging up
An antique dark-held luster to corrupt
The present light with smokes and smudges, poison
To outlast time and shatter comprehension.
Burning the world to live in it is wrong,
As wrong as to make war to get along
And be at peace, to falsify the land
By sciences of greed, or by demand
For food that’s fast or cheap to falsify
The body’s health and pleasure—don’t ask why.
But why not play it cool? Why not survive
By Nature’s laws that still keep us alive?
Let us enlighten, then, our earthly burdens
By going back to school, this time in gardens
That burn no hotter than the summer day.
By birth and growth, ripeness, death and decay,
By goods that bind us to all living things,
Life of our life, the garden lives and sings.
The Wheel of Life, delight, the fact of wonder,
Contemporary light, work, sweat, and hunger
Bring food to table, food to cellar shelves.
creature of the surface, like ourselves,
The garden lives by the immortal Wheel
That turns in place, year after year, to heal
It whole. Unlike our economic pyre
That draws from ancient rock a fossil fire,
An anti-life of radiance and fume
That burns as power and remains as doom,
The garden delves no deeper than its roots
And lifts no higher than its leaves and fruits.

As we transition into spring this year, let us be mindful of our relationship with the earth and appreciate the life it sustains. Wordsworth and Berry, too, would encourage us to accept what Nature provides, not exploit what Nature produces.

 

http://www.history.com/topics/industrial-revolution

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-lundberg/spring-poems_b_2884434.html

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2009/09/28/a-speech-to-the-garden-club-of-america

 

by Meaghan Latella

If you are of complete or at least partial Irish descent: Happy St. Patrick’s Day! And if you are not Irish, I might as well wish you a happy holiday too. This holiday may have begun in Ireland as a religious homage to Ireland’s patron saint (St. Patrick), but it is now a widespread phenomenon that has breached Ireland’s borders and infiltrated many other cultures, most notably in the United States. Every March 17^th, people around the world celebrate this holiday by attending parades, wearing green, and feasting on traditional Irish food—and beverage.

Like any holiday, St. Patrick’s Day has become commercialized over the years, and most people probably don’t even know why it began. It’s funny how initial purpose can be lost over time. Take Christmas for example. When you ask someone what their favorite part of the Christmas season is, most people would say something about spending time with their families, or singing Christmas carols, or baking pies and decorating cookies. Rare is it for someone to say that they most look forward to celebrating the birth of Jesus Christ. And yet, this is technically the sole purpose of Christmas.

We are all guilty of losing sight of our ancestry. It is not something you think about on a daily basis. Even though nearly one third of Americans can trace its lineage back to someone who migrated from Europe and went through Ellis Island, we do not spend loads of time looking into our family histories.

Today, I’d like to reference a poem written by Eavan Boland. Boland is often referred to as “Ireland’s greatest female poet.” Her work addresses a variety of topics, but it heavily focuses on the oppression of Irish women, and on the impact of the Famine. One of Boland’s more famous poems—“The Achill Woman”—recounts the story of when Boland met an old Irishwoman on Achill Island.

On its surface, the poem doesn’t appear to be about much of anything. The speaker—a young college girl, who we presume is Boland—meets the Achill woman one evening when she carries a bucket of water up to the cottage that Boland is renting. The poem characterizes a young Boland as ignorant and slightly dismissive of the old woman’s hardships. In the poem, Boland laments how “nothing now can change the way I went / indoors, chilled by the wind / and made a fire / and took down my book / and opened it and failed to comprehend / the harmonies of servitude…”

In an essay about the poem, Boland elaborates on the details of the conversation she had with the woman from Achill:

“She was the first person to talk to me about the famine. The first person, in fact, to speak to me with any force about the terrible parish of survival and death which the event had been in those regions. She kept repeating to me that they were great people, the people in the famine. Great people. I had never heard that before. She pointed out the beauties of the place. But they themselves, I see now, were a subtext. On the eastern side of Keel, the cliffs of Menawn rose sheer out of the water. And here was Keel itself, with its blond strand and broken stone, where the villagers in the famine, she told me, had moved closer to the shore, the better to eat the seaweed.” (Stef Crap, 2009).

Boland reveals that she was blind in her youth to the weight that this meeting carried. I’m sure Boland would now call her brief meeting with this woman a truly humbling experience.

After reading this poem, I’ve been forced to do a bit of self-reflection of my own. I am a quarter Irish, and my grandmother is of complete Irish descent. Her mother immigrated to the United States from her home country and settled in Staten Island, N.Y. in the early 1900s. I must confess that I know very little about my great-grandmother. I am one of those people who indulges in St. Paddy’s day celebrations every year, yet I’m guilty of not recognizing the roots of this holiday and my family’s relationship to it.

We as a society may not be the best at paying our respects to the past. In this fast paced world we live in, it’s hard not to devote all of our energies to keeping up with the present and gazing forward toward the future. But I can promise you one thing. Before today is over, I plan on calling my grandmother. After the mandatory greetings of “how are you” and “what’s new,” I want to ask her if she’ll tell me a story about her mother. It may not be a monumental gesture, but it will be my way of lending some authenticity to the green shirt that I’m wearing today.

For reference, here is “The Achill Woman” in its entirety:

 

THE ACHILL WOMAN

She came up the hill carrying water.
She wore a half-buttoned, wool cardigan,
a tea-towel round her waist.

She pushed the hair out of her eyes with
her free hand and put the bucket down.

The zinc-music of the handle on the rim
tuned the evening. An Easter moon rose.
In the next-door field a stream was
a fluid sunset; and then, stars.

I remember the cold rosiness of her hands.
She bent down and blew them like broth.
And round her waist, on a white background,
in coarse, woven letters, the words “glass cloth.”

And she was nearly finished for the day.
And I was all talk, raw from college —
weekending at a friend’s cottage
with one suitcase and the set text
of the Court poets of the Silver Age.

We stayed putting down time until
the evening turned cold without warning.
She said goodnight and started down the hill.

The grass changed from lavender to black.
The trees turned back to cold outlines.
You could taste frost

but nothing now can change the way I went
indoors, chilled by the wind
and made a fire
and took down my book
and opened it and failed to comprehend

the harmonies of servitude,
the grace music gives to flattery
and language borrows from ambition —

and how I fell asleep
oblivious to

the planets clouding over in the skies,
the slow decline of the spring moon,
the songs crying out their ironies.

–Eavan Boland

 

Sources:

http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wlu.edu/docview/1305129367?pq-origsite=summon

http://nw7pf8as2n.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%27Only+Not+beyond+Love%27%3A+Testimony%2C+Subalternity%2C+and+the+Famine+in+the+Poetry+of+Eavan+Boland&rft.jtitle=Neophilologus&rft.au=Craps%2C+Stef&rft.date=2010&rft.issn=1572-8668&rft.eissn=1572-8668&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=165&rft.externalDocID=R04285366&paramdict=en-US

by Claire Sbardella

In in her poem “Miss July Grows Older,” Margaret Atwood explores the process of aging and its impact on sexual attraction. Throughout this poem she comes to the realization that although she regrets the loss of her youthful charms, her life now is more fulfilling and well rounded. As one of this poem’s themes, Atwood professes a very jaded perspective on sex and dating, an effect only compounded by her cheeky and sarcastic tone. For her, sex is a pastime for the youth, something to outgrow “like a shrunk dress” as one matures. However, Atwood’s criticism less about sex and more about the men she does it with. In today’s culture, women are less stigmatized for engaging in sex, but the pleasure they gain from it tends to be far less than that derived by men. Atwood’s poem mirrors this dissatisfaction.

“A man writes me, requesting true-life stories / about bad sex…. / I never had any” (31-32, 39). Rather, men’s lack of consideration concerns Miss July. From the lack of the romantic “the absence of flowers” to power abuse “the death threats” to mundane annoyances “the eating habits at breakfast,” men fail to fulfill her expectations. This is mirrored in the article by Rebecca Traister, “The Game is Rigged” which she published in in a subsection of the NY Magazine website, “The Cut.” In this article, Traister discusses how consensual sex can still be joyless and disappointing for the women participating. Feminist discourse, the article argues, should not just cover the bounds of consent, but also focus on how women’s pleasure becomes overshadowed by the social expectation that they perform solely for the male (Traister 2015). The letter the man writes to Miss July, asking for these personal stories, illustrates a similar thoughtlessness to the men who fail to consider women during intercourse. The place where he found her name is “an old calendar, / the photo that’s mostly bum and daisies” (34). The man has written to someone he knows nothing about, to ask an invasive question. The calendar picture no longer represents her.

However, Miss July sees the coquettishness of her old days as something distant. In the first half of the poem she seems very ambivalent about her shift into middle age, “you think your mouth is the size is was. / You pretend not to care” (10-11). She remembers her days as an ingénue, when her “skin had the golden slick of fresh-spread margarine” and she dressed to impress men (36). However, with that change comes a greater appreciation of nature, of slowing down and savoring life “Now there are more of me…. / what you get is no longer / what you see” (68-69). This multiplicity suggests that she now sees herself as more than just a pretty flirt. Her looks now belie her personality, and her self-assurance has increased despite, or perhaps because of, her poor relationships with men.

Atwood’s poem mirrors some real-world problems that deal with communication during sex and the power imbalance between men and women. She focuses on the situations around sex and the disillusionment it gave her. The article focuses on how the power imbalance leads to the fact that a man’s pleasure dictates when the situation ends, and not the woman’s satisfaction. Feminism has made great strides in creating a more equal dynamic between men and women. However, much must be done before both sexes can stand on equal footing with each other.

A few years back I grew weary of the themed poetry anthologies, many published by university presses, some fascinating, but others not. Their themes were love or violence, race or place, this or that, but I often closed the covers wondering how many drum solos I could stand. In service of fair disclosure, I was asked to contribute poems to some of those collections, and even when I hesitated, I never wound up refusing. About the new Monticello in Mind volume, which I’ve just read, I do not have that weary feeling. In fact, I’m excited about it. The subtitle is Fifty Contemporary Poems on Jefferson, and complicated as our third president and his legacy are, I feel a refreshing wind blowing through most of the poems, even when their considerations and revelations are not cause for jubilation. Inconsistent and contradictory as he was on some matters, enlightened angel and red-headed devil that he could be, Jefferson was almost always provocative, and the midden of his brain continues to offer odd amulets, wisdom, boldness, risk, quirk and conundrum. He was a man of more than two minds, and to my knowledge one of the most interesting humans since Leonardo. Diplomat, farmer, philosopher, author, anthropologist, inventor, slave owner, secret keeper, fiddler – it’s almost too much for one person to ponder, though fifty people employing their separate sorceries of language can perhaps keep most of the juggler’s balls in the air at once, for a while.

Jefferson once wrote that keeping slaves was like holding a wolf by its ears. You don’t really want to hold on, but neither are you sure you want to let go. Maybe Jefferson was himself a kind of wolf, and we’re still similarly flummoxed as the metaphorical wolver was. Even the least forgiving might have trouble dismissing the architect, even the most avid acolyte will struggle with the image of shackles and overseer’s lashes. But editor Lisa Russ Spaar, who often contributes poems and reviews to Shenandoah, is fully aware of the Rubik’s cube of character, and she has found some four dozen poets who have lent their imagination and their craft to bring the Enlightenment’s great conundrum further into the light, even with the shadow still clinging to him.

I can hardly feign objectivity here. I can’t think of a poet who does more to bring her peers’ work into the public forum than Lisa, and she’s done it many times in the pages (and then links) of this journal. And to be fair, I’m one of the contributors to this current enterprise and count myself lucky, but setting this information aside, just open the book at random and read a few poems, then turn to Lisa’s astute and eloquent introduction. I believe the hook will be set, thrash and splash as you like; you will be reeled in.

Also in the interest in transparency, these poems are all, to varying degrees, about a person, a place, a historic time (though most reach toward the present and beyond) evident in lively ways, metaphor corraled, if not leashed. Even in the more extravagantly constructed poems, meaning is sought and achieved, imagery coherent, and everywhere one finds the pleasures of saying – this is a collection to be read aloud, to savor what Donald Hall has called “milktongue,” akin to what Robert Penn Warren called “the tangled glitter of syllables.” In short, I’m a neoclarificationist, and loose ends, fragments coy evasions are seldom what draws me to poems. I can really enjoy scat singing, either from the bandstand or on the page, but these poems seldom glorify the riff and tease (though I do love the lyrical “Hey hullah nonny fiddle honey-child o” in Tess Taylor’s “Graveyard, Monticello” and suspect it of having living roots). Narrative elements are prominent, form – either symmetrical or asymmetrical – is evident, and though humor is present, the poems are not jokes, shaggy dog stories, self-celebrations or the chic nonchalance often appearing in slick magazines.

If this sounds more like a celebration than a review, that’s appropriate. I have asked someone with no dog in the fight to review the anthology soon, no holds barred. The result should be less distracted and more professional, but I do want to tread on the reviewer’s territory a little. The University of Virginia has published Monticello in Mind in a hardback with a splendid dust cover and charges $22.95 for it. The blurbs on the back are deft and persuasive. This book is accessible, and it contains poems which will surprise, delight, perplex, goad and inspire readers. Author bios and brief commentary (by Spaar, who proves a dependable guide to both the place and the verse) follow the Afterward.

Who wrote them? Many, but not all, poets familiar to me: Talvikki Ansel, John Casteen, Claudia Emerson, Robert Hass, Terrance Hayes, Mark Jarman, Jennifer Key (a poem which received a prize from Shenandoah a few years back), Yusef Komunyakaa, Thorpe Moeckel, Chet’la Sebree, Tracy K. Smith, Natasha Trethewey, David Wojahn, Charles Wright, Kevin Young   It’s not fair to stop listing, but these particular authors are stuck in my mind this morning, and I promised our blog editor I’d be less windy here than usual.

Just a sample of the subject matter:, four of the poets have chosen to write about Jefferson’s attempt to create his own New Testament, what Spaar calls “a project somewhat postmodern in its technique of collage and erasure.” He wanted to excise events which confounded his Enlightenment perspective, but he didn’t succeed in banishing the sense of miracle and mystery.

Race, gender, love, empire, a living and working community, power of all stripes – these concerns ripple and surge through the collection. Bees hymn, children explore, artifacts are gathered and disappear and reemerge. Adults contend and one mind strives for a wildness of order. I feel the marvelous place in this book and recommend it, for all the beauty and pain available there. If Jefferson if our wolf, I sometimes want the impossible – to hold him and yet let him go, but about Monticello – estate and book – I feel less ambivalent, as Mary Ann Samyn phrases it at the end of her poem: “History begins to come true as we tell it. / This is the spot where.”

RTS

by Camille Hunt

The literary works of great authors are widely known and generally a bit about their personal lives, but their fates are not usually common knowledge. The brooding, troubled writer stands as a common stereotype, and while in some cases it holds true, many authors led perfectly normal, enjoyable lives. Wikipedia defines the concept of the ‘tortured artist’ as “a stock character and real-life stereotype who is in constant torment due to frustrations with art and other people.” Listed below are a few famous historical writers who undoubtedly fuel the dark stigma that frequently surrounds famous poets, novelists, and playwrights, alternating with a few who dispel it.

•   Oscar Wilde: Died destitute, without many friends, and under mysterious circumstances in Paris at age 46.
• Robert Penn Warren: Died at the age of 84 happy, successful, and as the first poet laureate of the United States.
• Virginia Woolf: Committed suicide at age 59 by filling her pockets with stones and walking into a river near her house to drown herself.
• William Faulkner: A Nobel Prize winner, Faulkner lived happily on his Mississippi farm and died at age 64.
• Ernest Hemingway: Committed suicide at age 61 with a gun.
• James Merrill: Son of investment banker Charles E Merrill, co-founder of the brokerage firm Merrill Lynch, James Merrill grew up extraordinarily wealthy. After winning virtually every literary prize known to man, Merrill died at age 68 of a heart attack while on vacation.
• The Brontë Sisters: All three died young of tuberculosis within less than seven years of each other. Emily died at the age of 30 in 1848, the same year that Wuthering Heights was published. Anne died at age 29 in 1849. Charlotte lived on until 1855, dying at age 38, three weeks before her 39^th
• Henry James: Well-travelled and exceptionally educated in his youth, James became a British socialite. He travelled between Europe and America at various points in his life; though born in the United States, James became a naturalized English citizen in 1915. He died renowned as a great writer of his century at age 72.
• Tennessee Williams: Choked on a bottle cap and died of suffocation. Williams had developed a drug and alcohol problem over the course of a steady decline in his career. By the time of his death, Williams had fallen from the spotlight and into a line of failed productions, never again achieving the same success as he experienced with hits like “A Streetcar Named Desire” and “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof.”
• Geoffrey Chaucer: Born to an affluent London wine merchant between 1340 and 1344, Chaucer flourished in multiple positions thanks to his father’s connections. He received a life pension from King Edward III of England, and traveled abroad on diplomatic missions. Eventually elected a justice of the peace and member of Parliament and considered today the “Father of English literature,” Chaucer died at age 57, well past the average life expectancy in medieval England.
• Edgar Allen Poe: Death is a mystery (fitting). Poe was found semi-conscious in a gutter, and never regained enough consciousness to explain what happened to him. Theories of how he got there include: beating, cooping, alcohol abuse, carbon monoxide poisoning, heavy metal poisoning, rabies, a brain tumor, the flu, and murder. Died at age 40.
• Harper Lee: Born in Monroeville, Alabama in 1926, Harper Lee wrote beloved Pulitzer Prize-winning novel To Kill a Mockingbird (1960). Lee published her second novel, a sequel to To Kill A Mocking Bird, fifty-five years later. She aided author and childhood friend Truman Capote in writing his blockbuster nonfiction piece, In Cold Blood (1966). Lee died this last month (February 19, 2016) at age 89 after living a quiet life between New York City and her home in Monroeville during which she made frequent and generous donations to charity.
• Truman Capote: Interestingly enough, his final work, Answered Prayers, features Tennessee Williams as a minor character. Answered Prayers, which essentially exposed the inner secrets of Manhattan’s elite and turned most of his high society friends against him, sent him into a tailspin of drug and alcohol abuse, the cause of death. The complete manuscript was never found; Random House published only the 180-some-odd pages that had been previously been released in magazines.

So, must writers, like the Brontë sisters, undergo immense suffering before their works reach the peak of recognition? Or can one, like James Merrill, enjoy a life of privilege and success, only to become just as renowned in the literary world? My list above debunks the common assumption that all history’s most talented writers were tortured, twisted souls. True, some did peak earlier in in their careers, the genius of their works recognized posthumously, but I find the ratio between those authors who found lasting success during their lifetime and those who did not fairly equal.

by Claire Sbardella

Jeannine Hall Gailey, in her book of poetry Becoming the Villainess, casts a modern perspective on woman’s role in the Grimm’s fairy tales and in the Metamorphoses. In most fairy tales, women are evil stepmothers, witches, or rivals. If they do not fill these roles, then they act as beautiful, virginal princesses waiting for husbands. In her book, Jeannine investigates how the adversity endured by the women in fairy tales damages their psyches and forces them into roles that disavow their true natures. This retelling allows these stories to remain fresh to modern female audiences, such as myself, by providing a commentary on gender roles that remains culturally relevant today.

The social pressure for women to dress and act in ways that please men, rather than focusing on their own potential, is the theme of “Little Cinder.” In this poem, the Cinderella tries to act in a way that would please her dead mother and the prince. In doing so she ignores “the flames [she] ignite[s] around [her],” which represent her own burning personality and potential. (l 22). She does not even notice her own power, even when “the kettle and the broom sear in [her] grasp, / snap into fragments,” so consumed she is with thoughts of “the makeover,” of wearing a “size-six heel” and wiping the “grime” off her face so that she can be noticed by the prince (ll 11, 12). The original fairy story only considers Cinderella’s beauty relevant, and this beauty of hers only gets revealed when she dons the ball gown. Her dirty rags and ashy face must go if she wishes to attract the Prince. However, there is a fine line between dressing up for men and appearing vain: too little and she goes unnoticed, too much and she risks becoming like her step-sisters, whose dogged vanity and pursuit of the prince lead them to have their eyes scratched out and their heels cut off. A woman must be virtuous and gorgeous, modest and desirable, in order to win the safety and status that marrying a man provides without suffering repercussions.

The need to appear appealing to men feeds off of another problem: violence against women. The poem “Allerleirauh Reveals Her True Self To The Prince” displays this succinctly. This poem relates the story of a girl who chose to be seen as a lunatic child because her father wanted to marry her. This story has many variants, including “Cap O’ Rushes,” and “The King Who Wished to Marry His Daughter.” In these stories, the princess flees her incestuous father and disguises herself, while attempting to reveal herself to the prince she loves. The story interprets as one of a girl seeking to gain healthy, socially accepted union while avoiding unnatural union. Jeannine’s further analysis does not deny this theme, rather it highlights the violence of the girl’s father. The poem mentions that in older versions of the story, the father finds out her disguise and “cuts off [her] hands; / other times, he cuts out [her] tongue” (20, 21). Indeed the girl’s desire is protection from the prince, which the poem shows in her lament that sometimes “I never even get to the safety of you,” (18).

The poem “Becoming the Villainess” wraps up both the need to look attractive and the violence towards young women by exploring how both of these pressures turn young, innocent women into villainesses. The poem alludes to many fairy tale stories and myths, such as the princess who turned into a white cat and Ovid’s Philomena and mythologies all share a common theme. Young women endure endless perils for the ultimate goal – attaining a husband of high rank to care for and protect them. This goal provides them the best life that feudal Europe and ancient Greece can provide – a wealthy man that can protect them from the world. However, as illustrated by the story of Philomena, whose sister’s husband rapes her and tears out her tongue so that she cannot tell, not even this provides protection from men who see them as objects. To gain safety, she must forgo humanity and become a bird. The poem explores the warping that traumas such as these do to a young girl’s psyche; to protect herself, “her heart…become[s] a stone” (l 32). Gailey argues that the constant care and attention women place on placating men fails to work, drains their resources, and leads them to seek agency in morally bankrupt ways.

Instead of the comfort and warnings that fairy tales once gave audiences hundreds of years ago, Jeannine Hall Gailey’s modern retellings of these ancient fairy tales ring with uncomfortable truths,. The violence and cruelty of the originals remain; they are merely couched in modern perspectives of feminism and human rights. For me, a woman living in the twentieth century, the way Gailey tells these stories makes them lose none of their power – rather, the modern twist of the content makes them more appealing and personally relevant.

by Rachel Baker

The battling smells of dumplings, snicker doodles, and marijuana waft down the market alley, men in suits brush by carrying tulips, and the whirr and hiss of coffee machines make their own place in the conversations of passersby. Mt. Rainier looks painted into the sky and the Olympic Mountains draw my attention from the skyline to the sound as the neon red sign begins to buzz on a rare clear night. There is a coffee shop and a bookstore on every corner. You can find them under polished signs or tucked into dark allies, big and small, national chains and indie. If you do not like coffee or books, you probably should leave Seattle immediately.

Seattle is known as the city of Amazon and Starbucks, but less notably they are bidding to become a UNESCO City of Literature. Both sides of my family live in the Carolinas, and I have only been to the west coast twice. If it were not for this week in Seattle I would have never known that such a rich literary community existed here. Sure there’re stereotypes. I believed Seattle to be artsy, outdoorsy, and quirky, but I suddenly realized that standing in Pikes Place market I am at a literary crossroads, standing somewhere between old and new, in the transition from print to digital, a witness to the fight to stay local in the face of giants.

There is an intimacy to bookstores and coffee shops that I do not believe the public is ready to let go of. The fact that independent stores are still flourishing in Seattle is a testament to the community’s support of literature. Signs for readings, book signings, and writer’s workshops are plastered on every window. I passed four independent bookstores on one street, all apparently unfazed by the digital trend. But then again I do not see their bank accounts. Amazon.com recently launched their first bookstore in Seattle. It seems odd to me that the online empire would expand to bricks and mortar when the national trend is to go digital. Amazon certainty does not need a bookstore to be successful, nor does it need one in order to compete with the independent booksellers in Seattle. However, their move to a physical store says something about what readers are longing for. A bookstore creates a sense of community that a website cannot. A bookstore is a place where people can meet, rest, read, discover, and hang out. Wherever you look you can see that green, Starbucks mermaid, staring at you from a window, but people still gravitate towards the cozy coffee shops that will draw hearts in your latte. Like local coffee shops, there is an intimacy to bookstores that I do not believe the public is ready to let go of. Bookstores provide an experience along with a book. The Elliott Bay Book Company is one of the largest and most successful independent booksellers in Seattle, and their store is filled with handwritten notes and recommendations from the staff. Your experience seems personalized, and an anonymous review online is not able to create that same connection. There something about an independent bookstore that you do not get from anywhere else, and that’s coming from someone who has a Kindle.

I got my love of reading from my mother. She used to take me to our public library where I would check out 20 books at a time. I believe I probably read every children’s chapter book in our library. My mom gave me my first Kindle when I was in middle school. The concept was crazy to me, but before long, Amazon replaced my public library. Before I go on a trip I’ll buy an arsenal of novels that I can hold in the palm of my hand. However, I still love physical books. I like thumbing the pages as I read, I love the smell, I love dog-earing the pages. I’ve had to draw a separation in my mind, balancing my love of books with the convenience and low price that a Kindle brings. Books I care about sit on my bookshelf, while books I will only read once sit in my Kindle.

Juggling pixels and paperbacks is not uncommon for today’s readers. It was once predicted that e-books would overtake print by 2015, but instead, digital sales have slowed. A recent Nielsen survey shows that people who read primarily on e-books dropped from 50 percent in the first quarter of 2012 to 32 percent in 2014.

Seattle’s literary community is so strong because it lies between the old and the new, managing to stay a step above outdated while hanging onto the intimacy and charm of mom and pop bookstores. Literature is not a passive art. For it to flourish, there needs to be a strong dialogue between artists and readers, and I found that in Seattle.